Architectural practice
without the compromise.
At a glance
Strong fit
AutoCAD is fast on a single drawing, but the project lives as a folder of DWGs you reconcile by hand. Synaps keeps the CAD speed and adds one live project context, linked views, sheet sets, and library roles, so a plan edit does not ripple through fourteen files.
Side by side
Feature-by-feature comparison of Synaps and Autodesk AutoCAD.
| Feature | Synaps | AutoCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Primary unit | Project with linked views | File per drawing |
| Sheet sets | Built-in, auto-numbered, drag-reorder | Sheet Set Manager add-on |
| Linked plan / section / detail | Live across edits | Xref + Sheet Set Manager |
| Office libraries | Publish / edit / view roles | Blocks + tool palettes per office |
| Customisation | Plugin API + design tokens | LISP, ARX, VBA, deep legacy ecosystem |
| DWG import / export | Yes, round-trip | Native |
| PDF issue | Sheet-set-aware | Requires print plot stamp discipline |
| Learning curve for editors | 2–5 days | Years to master deeply |
| Pricing model | Per editor, monthly | Per seat, annual |
Honest tradeoffs
Migration path
A two-week pilot on a live job. If documentation does not get faster, stop, even if the comparison reads in our favour.
Import one DWG library slice. Pick one live sheet set to own in Synaps.
Run internal review in Synaps. AutoCAD stays open for legacy details.
Issue one PDF set from Synaps. Compare hours against the same set in AutoCAD.
Yes, Synaps reads and writes DWG for round-trip with AutoCAD-class tools.
LISP runs in AutoCAD; it does not run in Synaps. Studios usually keep AutoCAD for legacy hacks and move documentation incrementally.
Yes, sheet sets are first-class. Drag-reorder, auto-numbering, linked title blocks, no add-on license.
Per editor, yes, and without annual lock-in. Most pilots start with two editors and a studio lead.
More comparisons