Architectural practice
without the compromise.
At a glance
Fit alongside Vectorworks
Vectorworks puts BIM and 2D in one file, so sheet sets and libraries move at the pace of the model file. Synaps takes documentation and library governance off that file, linked views and weekly PDF issue that do not wait on the design layers, while Vectorworks keeps BIM and site tools.
Side by side
Feature-by-feature comparison of Synaps and Vectorworks Architect.
| Feature | Synaps | Vectorworks |
|---|---|---|
| Primary surface | 2D drafting + sheet index | BIM + 2D hybrid model |
| Sheet sets | First-class, drag-reorder | Sheet layers + viewports |
| Linked views | Live across plan, section, detail | Viewport-linked to design layers |
| Office libraries | Publish / edit / view roles | Resource Manager + symbols |
| Landscape & site | Plan-driven | Strong site/Landmark tools |
| IFC / OPEN BIM | Import/export | Core workflow |
| PDF issue | Tuned for issued sets | Publish command |
| Pricing model | Per editor, monthly | Per seat, annual |
Honest tradeoffs
Migration path
A two-week pilot on a live job. If documentation does not get faster, stop, even if the comparison reads in our favour.
Export one symbol library slice and one sheet set. Set up the project in Synaps.
Run internal review in Synaps. Vectorworks stays the design archive.
Issue one PDF set from Synaps. Measure hours against the same set in Vectorworks.
Rarely on day one. Studios usually keep Vectorworks for BIM and site tools while Synaps owns drafting, libraries, and issued sets.
Synaps reads DWG and IFC exports from Vectorworks for geometry and view setup. Pilots start with one sheet set, not a wholesale migration.
Those verticals stay in Vectorworks. Synaps targets architectural documentation, plans, sections, details, and sheet sets.
Synaps is per-editor monthly without annual lock-in. Pilots typically start with two editors and a studio lead.
More comparisons